1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) indicated the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) on the attached Form 1 on the ground of 1,117 square meters above 1,00 square meters in Ansan-gu, Ansan-si.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 13, 2009, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the area of 1,117 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. On the ground of the instant land as of the closing date of pleadings, there is a steel network fence (hereinafter “instant fence”) connecting 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the same drawings, which are linked in sequence 1 and 2 of the annexed drawing Nos. 1 and 2 installed by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant gate”).

[Recognizing Facts] A without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, the result of the verification by this court, the result of the survey and appraisal by the President of the Republic of Korea National Land Information Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Defendant’s assertion, without any title, installed the main gate and fence on the ground of the instant land owned by the Plaintiff without any title, must be removed.

In addition, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,213,300 to the Defendant at the expense of surveying the boundary in order to clarify the boundary of the land in this case and the land in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, which is owned by the Defendant. Since the Defendant did not implement it, the Defendant shall return the said money to the Plaintiff in unjust enrichment

나. 피고의 주장 피고는 이 사건 토지에 맞닿은 안산시 상록구 D 및 E 토지의 소유자인데, 1996. 1. 12. 이 사건 울타리를 설치하고 이 사건 울타리와 피고 소유의 각 토지 사이의 이 사건 토지 부분인 별지2 도면 표시 ㈎ 부분 757㎡를 20년 이상 소유의 의사로 평온, 공연하게 점유함으로써 점유취득시효가 완성되었으므로, 그 경계를 표시한 이 사건 울타리와 위 ㈎ 부분 내에 설치된 이 사건 대문을 철거할 의무가 없고, 오히려 원고가 피고에게 위 ㈎ 부분에 관하여 2016. 1. 12.자 취득시효완성을 원인으로 한 소유권이전등기절차를 이행할 의무가 있다.

The boundary surveying claimed by the plaintiff is not implemented.