In 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes listed in the judgment of the defendant 1 and 2, 50,000 won for the crimes listed in the judgment of the defendant 3.

Punishment of the crime

On October 6, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. in the Seocho District Court's territorial branch of the Chuncheon District Court on December 21, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 21, 201, and on January 14, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual fraud at the Southern District Court's Maritime Branch of the Gwangju District Court on January 14, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence by the Gan

"Criminal Facts"

1. On July 14, 2016, the Defendant sent an attitude at the main point of “E” operated by the victim D, who is in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, even if he/she was provided with alcohol and alcohol, that he/she would normally pay the price even if he/she was unable to pay the price even if he/she was unable to do so, due to the fact-finding and de-verification of the ability to verify the fact due to a tide, etc. and the de-verification of the ability to discern things or make decisions. The Defendant ordered alcohol and alcohol.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, was provided with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 250,00 in total at the market price, such as scarchiski 1 disease, scarchisk 3 disease, and 1 disease in Japan.

2. On July 9, 2016, at around 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed the attitude that the victim G, operated in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, would normally pay the price even if he/she was provided with alcohol and alcohol, even if he/she did not have the intent and ability to pay it; and (b) issued an order of alcohol and alcohol.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received from the victim, i.e., scarchiski 1 disease, beer 2 disease, and scarchisk 1,30,000 won in total market value, such as scarchisk 1 disease, beer 2 disease, and beer.

3. The Defendant, on July 21, 2011, appears to have the ability to discern things or make decisions due to the de facto fact-verification of the right and the de facto fact-verification of the right and the injury of the right and the injury of the right and the right and the right and duty of decision.