logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2012.11.07 2012고정4551
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant, the defendant, the defendant, the defendant, the Eul, and the defendant of the joint criminal conduct in the form of a normal credit, reported advertisement from the financial institution's living information paper, etc., and the loan brokerage office operated by the C, sent the phone to the loan brokerage office operated by the C, and sought an explanation from the defendant's husband D and the defendant's husband D about 11 and 206 of the Busan Northern-gu E apartment 11 and 206, the defendant's husband of the defendant's husband, and agreed to receive and divide the loan with C, in collusion with C.

B, on April 22, 2009, a document prepared by C, etc., such as a real estate lease contract with the effect that he leases the above apartment house with the deposit deposit amount of KRW 40 million, and filed an application for a loan of money from the National Housing Fund with the employee in charge of lending from the National Housing Fund. The defendant, although he did not lease the above apartment house to B, has a man in fact made the above apartment house fright as D, and the employee in charge of lending from the new bank of the victim fright to "the above apartment house was leased to B as fright," and the above apartment was transferred from the new bank of the victim to the national bank account in the name of KRW 2.4 million on May 7, 2009, the defendant divided the amount of KRW 2.6 million and the remainder acquired as a fee.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim's new bank in collusion with B, C, etc.

2. The defendant, F's co-principal defendant, F's co-principal defendant, and F are allowed to run a loan brokerage office operated by C with a telephone call from the loan brokerage office operated by C, and the defendant's husband D's her husband's son G apartment 9 Dong 109 was to run and lease the deposit.

arrow