logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2016.10.13 2015가단6684
소유권이전등기말소
Text

1. Defendant B shall apply to the Plaintiff with respect to each share of 1/4 of the lands listed in the separate sheet.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The deceased E is a person who has a permanent domicile in the original unit F, and died on March 10, 1950. The deceased person’s name of the deceased person is G. The name of the deceased person of the Japanese type of Japanese type of Japanese type of Japanese type of Japanese type of Japanese type of Japanese type of the deceased person is G. Although Defendant C and D are disputing the fact that the deceased person’s new type of Japanese type of Japanese type of Japanese type of the deceased person, they are not accepted in light of the evidence No. 4 (G’s permanent domicile is the FF of the same original group of the Plaintiff), evidence No. 11, and evidence No. 12 (the fact that G’s permanent domicile is restored to the original unit of the Plaintiff), evidence No. 11, and No. 12 (the fact that G is included in the register of other land than each of the instant types of land). The deceased’s child has succeeded to the deceased person’s status as the head of South Korea and succeeded to the deceased person’s family type of family type No. 2).

M shall be children of K, and the network E shall be children of M.

N is L's children, and O is N's children.

The network E andO shall be between six degrees.

3) Defendant B is an O’s H. B. Each of the lands listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”). When individually indicated each of the instant lands, it is indicated in the same manner as “instant land No. 1” and “instant land No. 1 and 3.” The change of rights 1) each of the instant lands Nos. 1 and 3 as the former land cadastre Nos. 1 and 1 and 3, respectively, on the land cadastre of the instant case (No. 4 years presidentially).

6. It is the head of Q M with the address in P. 14.

As reference, the network E is the difference of M.

This ruling was received, 1927. (2 years, fire 2)

1. G with the F’s address in “F” was transferred ownership, and G with the “F” in “F” in 1943 (Fire 18 years), is the name of the creative name of the network E. As such, the network E is ultimately subject to transfer of ownership.

this ownership was transferred, and 1949 (short-term 4282)

2.7. A (Plaintiff) and three other parties (Plaintiffs) who have an address in “R” transfer ownership on May 9, 1973, whose ownership was preserved on May 9, 1973, and whose ownership was transferred to F on May 9, 1973.

The above matters are written in each form of land cadastre No. 1 and 3 of this case.

arrow