A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 17, 2018, around 00:35, the Defendant: (a) in front of “D cafeteria” located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (b) was arrested by the police box affiliated with the Seoul Geumcheon-gu Police Station E (Seoul) Police Station E (hereinafter “D cafeteria”); (c) was arrested by the citizens as a suspicion of property damage.

As stated in the above, the Defendant was notified that he would be subject to punishment if he could interfere with the legitimate performance of official duties, and the F would arrest the citizens of the police.

The following police officers, who wished to be “F, interfered with the legitimate execution of their duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders by walking the F’s full strength at several times.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of investigation reports (on-site conditions, witnesses), investigation reports ( telephone conversations between witnesses)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] There is no person [the person subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (six months to one year and six months), [the decision of sentencing] [the grounds for and content of the instant crime, the degree of violence, the circumstances after the instant crime, and the circumstances after the instant crime: Provided, That there is no record of criminal punishment in the Republic of Korea prior to the instant case, there is no record of criminal punishment in the instant case; the sentence was determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account the domestic sojourn relationship of the Defendant, other defendants' age, career, health status, and all other circumstances favorable or unfavorable to the defendants indicated in the arguments, such as the relationship of the Defendant's stay in Korea