logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.24 2015고정720
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant was a staff member of (ju) Mteft Life, and C was a staff member of the same kind in the past.

① On October 1, 2014, around 19:23, the Defendant: (a) opened the Defendant’s intra-company computer in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, with access to the Internet; (b) opened the bulletin board “D” on the homepage of the City Council website of the City Council affiliated with C; and (c) opened “D”; and (d) up to 1st century, “Lient, good, and young, young, young, young, young, young, young, and 20% of the amount of money.” On the other hand, the Defendant continued to prepare a false statement that the Defendant would have been unable to pay the money to the residents and to return it to the 20% of the amount of money borrowed; and (c) made it difficult for the Defendant to read the money borrowed on the website of the City on the 2nd anniversary of the fact that the Defendant did not intentionally have received the loan from the 2nd anniversary of the loan.”

Accordingly, the defendant has harmed C's honor by publicly expressing false facts through information and communications networks with a view to slandering C.

2. Determination

A. In the case of “an act damaging people’s honor by exposing any false fact” under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.

arrow