beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 1,018,645,072 to Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 8,000,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) KRW 2,00,000 to Plaintiff C and D, respectively.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
(a) Recognition 1) E is a U.S.-W.-W. 11:30 on September 19, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”).
) The instant accident is the case in which the Defendant’s vehicle, while driving his vehicle operated a string of the road in G located in G located in G located in G located in the south bank without emphasizing the front bank from the south bank to the water bank, was deprived of the retaining wall by leaving the right bank and farm (hereinafter “the instant accident”).
2) The Plaintiff A, who was on board the Chief of the Defendant’s vehicle due to the instant accident, sustained an injury, such as a shotf, etc. due to damage to the shotf.
3) The Plaintiff B is the husband of the Plaintiff A, and the Plaintiff C and D are the children of the Plaintiff, and the Defendant is the insurer who concluded a comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle. (b) According to the fact of recognition of liability, the Defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident as the insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle. (c) The Defendant claimed that the Defendant should limit the Defendant’s liability by taking account of the fact that: (a) the Plaintiff was the direct cause provider of the instant accident; (b) the Plaintiff was the driver, and (c) the Plaintiff was a driver and his wife, who was on board the Defendant’s vehicle for the purpose of leading to the instant accident; and (b) the Plaintiff was not the passenger; and (b) the driver was negligent in violating the duty of urge safe operation, even if there was a high risk of the occurrence of the accident.
2. E, the driver of the Defendant vehicle, explained the situation to the Plaintiff, who is the branch, such as the household defect and farm experience, while explaining the situation to the Plaintiff who is the branch, thereby getting off the Defendant vehicle and getting off the Defendant vehicle at the company and farm.
The plaintiff A, who was on the first place, entered the destination to the National Assembly, and E was wrong.