The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant in the facts charged is a person who engages in clothing wholesale business under the trade name of “D” in the middle-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1st floor 21.

A. On May 24, 2017, the Defendant sent a word “E” to the victim E, who is a joint management of the above commercial building, using a mobile phone at a place where the location of around 19:38 cannot be known, using the mobile phone on May 24, 2017.

However, there was no assertion that the sectional owner had appropriated the earnings for the unpaid management of the common areas in the course of the trial.

Accordingly, the Defendant posted false information for the purpose of slandering the victim through information and communication network, thereby damaging the honor of the victim publicly.

2) On May 25, 2017, the Defendant of defamation against the Victim F, using a mobile phone at a place where it is difficult to know the location around 12:48 on May 25, 2017. We consider whether the owner of the above commercial building, who is the joint management of the above commercial building, is aware of whether the owner of the above commercial building, is in existence of the divided owner’s property right in addition to the fact that the owner of the above commercial building, who is the joint management of the commercial building, is a monthly class of 73 spawn, with no expertise in the management of the commercial building, and that there is a monthly class of 73 spawn in the management place.

The phrase “contributed” was sent.

However, in fact, the benefits that the injured party receives from the management body of commercial buildings were limited to KRW 1 million per month.

Accordingly, the Defendant posted false information for the purpose of slandering the victim through information and communication network, thereby damaging the honor of the victim publicly.

B. The Defendant’s insult is a mobile phone at a place where the location of the warning area is unknown on May 24, 2017.