Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On September 25, 2018, the Defendant driven a car in the Bado B around 23:40 on September 25, 2018, while driving a car in the 414-lane 7-lane ahead of the 414-lane office building distance at the airport in Gangseo-gu, Seoul and driving along three-lanes from the mountain basin in the mountain basin, the Defendant left the left at the speed of about 20 km at the speed of Gangseo-gu office. Since a signal apparatus is installed and traffic control is performed, the Defendant was obliged to safely drive the car in accordance with the signals of the signal apparatus while driving the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the DX50-wheeled Vehicle, which was driven by the victim C(29 years of age) who was driven by the victim C(29 years of age) in the opposite opposite vehicle due to negligence in violation of the right-hand turn signals, as the front part of the car of the Defendant.

결국 피고인은 위와 같은 업무상 과실로 피해자에게 약 12주간의 치료가 필요한 발목 및 발의 기타 부분의 으깸손상 등의 상해를 입게 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement E and C;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Blukbbox cream;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. There are more favorable circumstances such as the fact that the Defendant’s negligence on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is less severe than that of the Defendant, is disadvantageous to the Defendant, that there was an agreement with the victim, that there was a comprehensive insurance contract, that there was no power on criminal punishment.

The defendant shall be punished by a fine in full view of the sentencing conditions prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, including the defendant's age, occupation and family environment.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.