logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.04.06 2016나58923
소유권말소등기
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant is among each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1.

Reasons

1. The reasons for this court’s explanation are as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance, except for dismissal or addition as stated in paragraph 2, and therefore, they are quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. From 5th 6th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e.

A person shall be appointed.

A. 1) Determination as to the cause of the claim = 1) although the legacy of the deceased against the defendant is valid, the defendant is obligated to implement the procedures for the transfer of ownership due to the plaintiff's share of 1/10 (1/5 of the plaintiff's statutory inheritance 】 1/2 of the land of this case : 2) - shortage in the calculation method of the legal reserve of inheritance = [A] 】 Special benefit rate of the person entitled to the legal reserve of inheritance (B) - (D) - Net donation of the deceased 2. 3 : 1 : 1 : 1/10 (1/5 of the plaintiff's legal reserve of inheritance) - 1/4 as to the legal reserve of inheritance : 30 : 70 - 41 : 306 - 70 - 30 5 - 71 : 30 - 70 5 - 4 - 70 ,75 - 27 - 3 5 - - 3 5 -7 - 4 - -7 - 5 - - 1 - 1 -7 -

arrow