Text
1. The part of the judgment of the court below regarding Defendant B shall be reversed.
Defendant
B. The Defendant A’s appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Defendant A1) Although Defendant A did not know the victims well and did not directly commit a deceitful act against the victims, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby finding Defendant A guilty.
2) Defendant A guilty of an unfair sentencing case
Even if the court below's sentence (one year and six months of imprisonment) imposed on Defendant A is too unreasonable.
B. Defendant B (1) through misunderstanding of the legal principles, Defendant B was used as a tool to commit the instant fraud by Defendant A, and was not by deceiving the victims, but by deceiving the victims, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal principles, or by misapprehending the legal principles, thereby admitting Defendant B guilty.
2) Defendant B guilty of an unfair sentencing case
Even if the court below's sentence (three years of imprisonment) imposed on Defendant B is too unreasonable.
2. The reasoning of the lower judgment on Defendant B’s assertion of misunderstanding of the facts or misapprehension of the legal doctrine is as follows: (a) the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, such as the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, was proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendant B conspired with the victims, such as the relevant public prosecution room, and acquired money by deceiving them.
It is difficult to see it.
Therefore, the court below's finding Defendant B guilty is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts or misunderstanding the legal principles, so Defendant B's misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of the legal principles is with merit.
A. Defendant B is actually “F” as evidence to acknowledge that Defendant B conspired with Defendant A to deception victims by deceiving them, such as the public prosecution room, but this is an error of “S”.
(hereinafter referred to as “S”) made available to Defendant B by falsely manipulating the transaction details and this Pats.