Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

The defendants are the representatives of the representatives of the E apartment site residents' representative council in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, and the victim F is the managing director of the above apartment complex.

1. The Defendants of the crime committed around October 19, 2016 at the E Apartment apartment management office managed by the victim F of the victim F in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si on October 19, 2016, and “the valves need not be replaced.”

If there is a match, it is necessary to do so.

It is essential to replace money with money on the face of the breakdown.

We need not construct a valve on water water.

If the complaint is in mind or not.

The management of the apartment of the victim was obstructed by force for about one hour and 30 minutes, such as passing over “.....”

2. On November 16, 2016, the Defendants committed the crime at the E apartment management office managed by the victim F in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si on November 16, 2016, and “whether the rooftop waterproof Construction Works has become aware of the resolution” in the E apartment management office managed by the victim F in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si.

Whether or not it is urgent to see the year.

The rooftop waterproof contract was wrong.

J. D. 33 million won with the mind of the construction of the fake

For about 30 minutes, it interfered with the management of the apartment of the victim by force for about 30 minutes, such as cutting down on the rooftop where the waterproof construction is continuing to be carried out, with the floor of hand, etc., “......”

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F (part);

1. A meeting for the representatives of occupants (No. 33);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (to telephone investigation of a business operator who performed a defensive construction work);

1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; and the choice of fines

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Each of the instant crimes committed by the Defendants on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which had no record of punishment.