1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A KRW 174,217,803, and KRW 4,000,000 to the plaintiff B, and KRW 4,00,000 to the plaintiff C, respectively.

1. Whether liability for damages arises and restrictions thereon;

A. On November 12, 2016, F, such as the occurrence of a traffic accident, was driving a G K5 business taxi (hereinafter “franchising vehicle”) around 03:10 on November 12, 2016, while driving a two-lane from the four-distance room in the front of the Daegu Western-gu H with I apartment room, the line was changed into one lane in order to discover visitors on the franchis of the road in the direction of the proceeding and to board the taxi.

In such a case, the driver of a vehicle has a duty of care to safely change the vehicle from the rear side of the vehicle line that is changed after reducing the speed of the vehicle, taking the front, rear, left, and right and right of the vehicle, and after checking whether there are vehicles entering the rear side of the vehicle with the direction of direction, but the driver of the vehicle under the duty of care to safely change the vehicle. However, the driver of the vehicle under the duty of care is negligent in changing the vehicle while neglecting it, and the driver of the vehicle under the duty of care to change the vehicle from the first lane of the vehicle under the same direction, and the driver of the vehicle under the duty of care to drive the vehicle under the direction of the vehicle under the direction of the vehicle under the direction of the vehicle under the back (hereinafter “victim under duty”). Accordingly, the Plaintiff, who was on the rear seat of the damaged vehicle under the back of the vehicle under the duty of care, was injured by the vehicle under the obligation of the above student under the duty of exemption from the status of the Plaintiff and the Defendant, etc., at the time of the accident of the above school (hereinafter “accident”).

Due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff A received stimulative and static surgery, metal-resistant and static surgery, etc. on November 16, 2016, with respect to the ground for crushing of pulvers to the right side of the instant case. On February 22, 2017, Plaintiff A was subject to stimulation on the right side of stimuls, etc., and was subject to a military exemption disposition on June 7, 2018 (physical Grade V wartime labor).

Plaintiff

B is the father of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is the mother of Plaintiff A.

The defendant is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to a sea-going vehicle (business taxi).

The defendant supplementary intervenor is between M and M.