logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.05.13 2014나6408
보증금반환
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. On January 3, 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Plaintiff on the lease deposit amounting to KRW 10 million and the lease period of KRW 50,000,000 and KRW 50,000,000. The Defendant agreed to refund the lease deposit to the Plaintiff by December 2013 (hereinafter “instant lease contract”).

(2) On January 6, 2014, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant that the lease deposit should be returned on the ground that the instant lease contract was extinguished on December 30, 2013. (2) The Plaintiff requested the Plaintiff to deliver the said land and the plastic houses on the ground that the instant lease contract was extinguished.

[Grounds for Recognition: Evidence No. 1-5, Evidence No. 2, 3, and 4-2, the purport of the whole pleadings]

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant agreed to refund the lease deposit by December 2, 2013, and barring any special circumstance, barring any special circumstance, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from March 4, 2014 to the date of full payment, which is the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case sought by the Plaintiff from March 4, 2014 to the day of full payment.

(2) The Defendant’s claim on January 2, 201 is justified and remanded to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench, except as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal. In so doing, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, except as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal.

arrow