The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Sexual assault against the defendant for forty hours.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. (1) Defendant (1) had committed the instant crime under the mental and physical weakness since the Defendant was under medical treatment due to the occupational division but was not able to take drugs for 4 days after the prescribed drugs.

(2) The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (ten months of imprisonment and forty hours of order to complete a sexual assault treatment program) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. We examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for ex officio appeal.

Article 56(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (amended by Act No. 15352, Jan. 16, 2018) uniformly restricted a person who was finally determined to be sentenced to a punishment or treatment for a sex offense against a child or juvenile or a sex offense against an adult (hereinafter referred to as "sex offense") from employment to a child or juvenile-related institution, for ten years from the date on which the execution of the punishment or treatment or care or custody was wholly or partially terminated or suspended.

However, Article 56(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (hereinafter “Revised Juvenile Sex Protection Act”) which was amended by Act No. 15352 and enforced July 17, 2018 requires a court to issue an order to restrict employment, etc. to a child or juvenile-related institution at the same time with a judgment on a sex offense case (excluding a person subject to a fine pursuant to Article 11(5)), where the court issues a punishment or treatment, or a custody for a sex offense case (excluding a person subject to a fine pursuant to Article 11(5)), and at the same time issues an order to restrict employment, etc. with a period of restriction on employment (Provided, That the period shall not exceed ten years pursuant to Article 11(2)). There are special circumstances that the risk of recidivism

In determining whether to issue an employment restriction order, it is stipulated that it will not issue an employment restriction order.

In addition, Article 3 of the Addenda to the same law provides that the amended provisions of Article 56 above shall commit sex offenses before this Act enters into force and have not received final judgment.