The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two million won in penalty) is too unfluent and unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unaffortunate, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, etc.; (b) the fact that the Defendant was led to the confession of the crime; (c) the Defendant’s treatment for alcohol addiction; and (d) the fact that the Defendant was punished several times during the period of repeated crime due to the same kind of crime; (d) the police officer working for the same crime was insulting; and (e) the nature of the crime was not less harsh.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.