logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2019.07.03 2019고단144
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seven months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 144"

1. In the process of disputing with B on May 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) stated the part of the Defendant’s driver’s seat ring on the part of the Defendant’s vehicle; (b) on June 10, 2016, the Defendant entered the simple receipt that was received from “E company” in the D Defendant’s vehicle parked on the street, which was parked on the street of Kimhae-si, in order to submit the case of assault and property damage to the investigation agency during the investigation; and (c) on June 10, 2016, the Defendant entered the test in the item column “70,000” in the “on June 10, 2016,” the total amount of proceeds from supply; and (d) the item column “on the part of the driver’s seat ring” in the item column.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a receipt in the name of E Company F, which is a private document concerning a certificate of fact.

2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

A. On July 29, 2016, the Defendant submitted a receipt forged as described in paragraph (1) as evidence to the police officer in charge of investigating the Defendant and B’s assault and property damage in the Busan Police Station and G office located in the Busan Police Station, which is located in 264(Seoul), as the superintendent of the Seo-gu, Busan, and the police officer in charge of investigating the Defendant’s assault and property damage, and exercised it.

B. On February 9, 2017, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against B for damages at the Busan District Court located in the Busan District Court, which was located in the Busan District Court, the Busan District Court, and submitted one receipt forged as evidence to the competent court and exercised it as if it were duly established.

"2019 Highest 359"

3. On May 31, 2016, in the course of a dispute with the victim B, the Defendant forged false evidence: (a) the part on the driver’s seat of the Defendant’s vehicle was displayed; (b) but the Defendant did not repair the vehicle due to lack of time; (c) on June 10, 2016, the Defendant submitted to the investigation agency for the investigation of the instant case of assault and damage to property against the victim; (d) on the date of a simple receipt issued by the Defendant, which was parked on the street of Kimhae-si, from “E Company”, to submit to the investigation agency under investigation of the instant case of assault and damage to property.

arrow