A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around January 30, 2018, the Defendant listened to the statement that it is necessary by 2 head of the C bank account in the name of the Defendant to create the details of the account transaction, which is a loan condition, from a person without the name of the company that provides Internet loans, and sent 2 head of the C bank account connected to the C bank account under the name of the Defendant on the same day, but on January 31, 2018, the said D bank account was suspended for use in the so-called “Scishing” (hereinafter “Scishing”), and thus, the Defendant’s account number was known that the Defendant’s account may be used in the crime of telephone financial fraud against a large number of unspecified victims, while recognizing the fact that the Defendant’s account may be used in the crime of fraud against a large number of unspecified victims on February 5, 2018.

On February 7, 2018, after delivering the account number of G bank bank account in the name of the defendant, the victim B was phoneed to the victim B on February 7, 2018, and falsely misrepresented the victim B with the I investigator of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office, "The victim's passbook was registered as a passbook. Therefore, the victim's passbook was wired to the virtual account so that it can trace illegal funds through the Financial Supervisory Service, and the victim was wired to the above G bank account in the name of the defendant around 12:31 on the same day from the victim.

On the same day, the Defendant withdrawn KRW 6 million deposited by the victim from the said G bank account in the name of the Defendant at the point of distributing the said G bank according to the direction of the person without his name on the same day, and delivered the same to the person with no name.

Accordingly, the defendant knew that he was used by the above person in the name of the defendant for committing a telephone financial fraud, and knew of the account number in the name of the defendant, and withdraws money remitted to the above account, thereby facilitating the crime.