1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the National Federation of Community Credit Cooperatives shall be dismissed;

2. The plaintiff's defendant B Saemaul Savings Depository

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant Community Credit Cooperatives Federation (hereinafter “Defendant Community Credit Cooperatives Federation”) is a non-profit corporation established pursuant to Article 54 of the same Act with the aim of guiding and supervising the business of a credit cooperative established pursuant to the Community Credit Cooperatives Act and promoting its common interest and sustainable development.

Defendant B Saemaul Savings Depository (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Saemaul Savings Depository”) is a non-profit corporation established pursuant to Article 7 of the Community Credit Cooperatives Act, and is a regional safe under the jurisdiction of the Seoul Regional Headquarters of the Seoul Regional Headquarters of the

On March 21, 1985, the Plaintiff entered the Defendant’s Treasury on March 21, 1985, and has been working as a managing director from around 2006, and from around 2011, as a managing director.

B. The defendant Federation from August 22, 2013 to the same year

9.2. A regular inspection on the Defendant’s credit cooperative was conducted by the end of February. As a result, the Plaintiff discovered the Plaintiff’s misconduct of “(i) private financial good offices and good offices; (ii) private monetary transactions between employees and members; (iii) non-resources remittance; (iv) violation of the Real Name Financial Transactions Act; (v) excess loans to the same person; (vi) violation of the lending limit in the same form of credit; (vii) violation of the lending limit in excess of the same person’s credit system; and (8) omission

C. Accordingly, on September 6, 2013, the Defendant’s Treasury held a temporary directors’ meeting on a temporary basis and decided on the dismissal of the Plaintiff from position and a standby order against the Plaintiff as of September 9, 2013, with the period of September 9, 2013 as “not later than the time a corrective order has been issued”

On September 16, 2013, the Defendant Federation notified the Plaintiff of the attendance of the hearing procedures held on September 25, 2013 in accordance with Articles 23-2 and 23-3 of the Inspection Regulations of the Defendant Federation.

After undergoing the above hearing procedure, the defendant Federation issued an instruction of reprimand on October 24, 2013 against the defendant's credit cooperative to dismiss the plaintiff.

E. On October 24, 2013, the Defendant Federation’s re-period against the Plaintiff as “not later than the time of a resolution on disciplinary action under the corrective order” under the direction of reprimand by the Defendant Federation.