logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2021.01.15 2019가단112623
건물명도(인도)
Text

Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant C, and Defendant D, respectively, have the real estate in the attached Table 1 attached hereto, the real estate in the attached Table 2.

Reasons

1. Claim against Defendant D or F

A. Basic facts 1) The Plaintiff is an association established to implement a housing redevelopment and improvement project (hereinafter “maintenance project in this case”) with the size of 69,774.7m2 in Busan Seo-gu JJ as the business area (hereinafter “instant business area”).

2) On September 13, 2005, the Plaintiff obtained authorization for the establishment of an association from the head of the Busan Seo-gu Office, and obtained authorization for the implementation of the project on July 7, 2006. On August 14, 2019, the Plaintiff obtained authorization for the management and disposal plan of the instant rearrangement project from the head of the Busan Seo-gu Office.

On August 21, 2019, the head of the Busan Seo-gu Office publicly announced the management and disposal plan.

3) Defendant D is the lessee of the re-building attached Table 3, which is the building in the instant project zone, and Defendant F is the lessee of the re-building attached Table 5, and the said Defendants are occupying and using each of the above buildings.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 11, Gap evidence No. 12-2, Gap evidence No. 13-18, Eul evidence No. 13-18, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. Determination 1) According to Article 81(1) of the Act on the Establishment of Urban Areas and Residential Environments (hereinafter below, “Act on the Establishment of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions,”) regarding the cause of a claim, a person holding a right, such as a person holding a right to lease on a deposit basis with a person holding a right to lease on a deposit basis, cannot use or profit from the previous land or building until the date of the public announcement of transfer under Article 86, and the project implementer can use or benefit from the former land or building until the date of public announcement of transfer under Article 86 (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da53635, May 27, 2010). Accordingly, if a public announcement is made by the project implementer, the project implementer may seek the transfer of the real estate in his/her possession against the lessee of the land or building located within the rearrangement zone based on the foregoing provision (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2012Da62561, Jul. 24, 2014).

arrow