beta
Text
1. The Defendants shall jointly:
A. Defendant C with respect to Plaintiff A’s KRW 4,630,540 and its amount, from September 14, 2017, and Defendant C.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Defendant C is the actual operator of Defendant D Limited Liability Company (hereinafter “Defendant D”), and Defendant D obtained permission for trucking transport business, and owned E-trucks (hereinafter “instant truck”) and relevant trucking transport business rights.
B. On November 6, 2006, Defendant C forged the notification of the repair of the instant truck, which is a truck with a specific-use type permitted for supply, and revised it to a general truck with limited supply-type truck.
C. On May 7, 2013, Plaintiff B (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”) obtained permission for trucking transport business, and acquired the instant truck and its trucking transport business rights from Defendant D.
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant transfer contract”). Plaintiff B changed the registration number of the instant truck to F, and used it for trucking transport business.
Defendant C on June 16, 2016
1.(b)
In the same manner as described in the subsection, the trucking transport business was operated by illegally increasing the ordinary truck without obtaining permission for change.
“Around June 10, 2016, the trucking transport business operator was sentenced to a fine of KRW 10,000,000, and Defendant D was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3,000,000 in accordance with joint penal provisions on the same day (Seoul District Court 2014No1532), and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time. E. On June 10, 2016, the Dacheon City: (a) deemed that the instant truck was changed to a general truck for the permissible special purpose type of truck to a supply-restricted general truck by forging the notification of the repair of the relevant truck; (b) deemed that the instant truck was changed to a supply-restricted general truck by unlawful means, such as forging the notification of the repair of the relevant truck; and (c) issued a disposition to suspend the operation of the instant truck to Plaintiff B for 60 days. Around July 2016, Plaintiff B acquired the instant truck, not the Plaintiff B,