Defendant

All appeals filed by C and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant C’s punishment is too unreasonable.

B. The court below found the defendant B not guilty on the ground that the defendant B was involved in the crime of gambling by viewing the net within the vehicle at the time of the instant case. The court below erred by erroneous determination.

2) The lower court’s respective sentences against Defendant A and C, which were unfair in sentencing, are too unfluent and unfair.

2. We examine the prosecutor's assertion of mistake of facts as to Defendant B, and as the court below properly decided, it is not sufficient to acknowledge the facts charged only by the statement of crackdown police officers L, and even if M's police statement that the defendant lent money at the gambling site, it was proved that the facts charged against the defendant was proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

It is still insufficient to view it, and there is no other evidence to recognize it.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion of mistake is without merit.

3. The instant crime of this case with regard to determining the illegality of sentencing by Defendant C and the Prosecutor is an offense committed again by the Defendant during the same repeated crime period, and the nature of the offense is not weak.

On the other hand, the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case in the trial, and the degree of the defendant's participation in the crimes of this case is minor.

In full view of all the circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, as mentioned in the records and arguments of this case, the lower court’s punishment in this case, in which no particular change in circumstances exists in the sentencing conditions in the trial compared to the lower court, is within the scope of reasonable discretion, and is too heavy or unbrupted and unreasonable.

4. The instant crime committed by the prosecutor with regard to the prosecutor’s improper assertion of sentencing against the Defendant A is that the Defendant led to the opening of gambling places for profit, and the nature of the crime is somewhat weak.