logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.09.14 2017고단1596
사기
Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a term of four months or more, or by imprisonment for a term of two years or more with prison labor for a term of one decision.

The defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On December 14, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court, and on March 8, 2012, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence at the public prison on March 8, 2012. On July 9, 2014, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year to imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on May 25, 2015 after the said judgment became final and conclusive.

1. “Around March 2012, the Defendant came to know of the victim D at the Internet divorce conference around 2012.

On April 2012, the Defendant made a false statement that he would give interest to the victim twice a month and return the principal to the victim in the hotel coffee shop located in Songpa-gu Seoul.

However, the Defendant tried to prepare a project fund by receiving money from the injured party. On March 2012, 2012, the Defendant released him from a prison for the first time and did not have any occupation. The Defendant received money from the injured party because there was no property other than KRW 5 million.

No intention or ability to pay interest to the victims or return the principal.

The Defendant received KRW 20 million from the injured party on April 9, 2012, and KRW 10 million on December 12 of the same month.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. "2017 Highest 3856".

A. On April 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant may receive interest from lending money from the victim before the victim F’s house located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, to the effect that “the Defendant may receive more than one person, and the Bank may receive more than one person, and upon completion of lending, will fully repay the principal and interest.”

However, in fact, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he was scheduled to consume it for other purposes without delivering it to the buildinger.

The defendant deceivings the victim and is under his control.

arrow