1. The defendant 267,190,320 won against the plaintiff Sporo Comprehensive Construction Co., Ltd. and 33.

A. From March 26, 2009, the first construction contract was concluded with 270 days in total construction period and 720 days in total construction period (hereinafter “instant construction contract”).

3) The instant construction contract was determined on April 15, 2015 as the final construction cost, following several changes in the contract, and the period of completion. The Defendant, instead of the Korea Local Government Procurement Service, was the contracting party to the instant contract after the first contract was changed. From the date of the change contract on December 27, 2013, the share of the joint supply and demand company’s joint supply and demand company’s joint supply and demand company’s joint supply and demand company’s joint supply and demand company’s joint supply and demand company’s construction (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff’s comprehensive construction”) was set at KRW 36,065,309,00.

[1] 8.8% of the total construction of Plaintiff Sea Oil Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the comprehensive construction of Plaintiff Sea Oil”).

(B) A change was made to 11.2%. (b) At the time of the public announcement of the tender, the order specifications presented by the Gyeongnam National Government Procurement Service were written in terms of size “12LIT/MIN*12KW”, quantity “12, unit price 260,000 won with respect to the hot water season to be installed at the construction site of this case.

However, the design of the instant construction contract was indicated only as a volume 12Li/mination, size 130:W 130:H30:H30; and a consumption power 12KW. The detailed statement of calculation submitted by the Plaintiffs at the time of tender was indicated as the unit price of the hot water season, “12LIT/MIN*12KW” and the total amount of 243,000,000,000 won, which is the unit price of the hot water season, “12LIT/MIN*12KW”. However, the said design and the detailed statement of calculation became part of the instant construction contract.

2) On April 19, 2010, Plaintiff Stim General Construction submitted a written request for material selection to the responsible supervisor on September 28, 2010, in order to establish a hot water model with the confirmation that the hot water period applied to each design from the Art Center, Inc., the responsible designer, on August 2010, the MBC Art Center, “T-38012 x 12K” model. However, the responsible supervisor submitted a written request for material selection to the responsible supervisor on September 28, 2010.