Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 16:38 on April 16, 2019, the Defendant: (a) discovered Ildong-gu B Apartment-dong, Goyangdong-gu, Goyang-si, and (b) discovered 112 residents in the D Park and sent to the D Park with 112 report; and (c) tried to see that the Defendant “nick-dong, Handong-gu, U.S., U.S., and U.S. E zone-affiliated, U.S., U.S., and U.S., U.S., U.S., and U.S., U.S., U.S. (hereinafter “F”), “I dice dice with internal alcohol, and talked with this document,” and “I am the Defendant’s bridge with the Defendant’s bridge.”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials in relation to 112 reported handling affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a DNA camping CD or investigative report (dynamic image verification);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not likely to have been committed by exercising the direct force on the body of the police officer dispatched after receiving a report by the defendant.

However, the fact that the defendant recognizes the crime of this case and is against the defendant, and that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment in 2014 as a result of the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, etc. shall be considered as favorable to the defendant

In addition, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following factors, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relations, motive and circumstances after the crime, and various sentencing factors specified in the records and arguments of this case.