Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On May 14, 2017, the Defendant forced indecent act: (a) accessed the victim D (V, 24 years of age) who is performing customer guidance service in the middle-gu Seoul Central District Office C’s 1st century; (b) told the victim D (V, 24 years of age) who is performing customer guidance service in Korean; and (c) changed the victim’s hand to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able
2. 업무 방해 피고인은 같은 일시ㆍ장소에서, 피해자에게 “ 섹 스 섹 스 ”라고 한 글자씩 끊어 말하고, “ 또 보자, 씨 유어 게인, 또 봐 알겠지 뭘 또 보지 ”, “ 지로 끝나고 그 앞이 비읍( ㅂ) 이야,
6. The victim interfered with the customer guidance service of the victim by force, such as prohibiting the victim from providing customer guidance service for about ten minutes, while speaking as "the 6th place and the 6th place."
Summary of Evidence
1. Legal statement of the witness D;
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. Application of the statutes governing the arrest of flagrant offenders;
1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;
1. As to the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant asserted that he had mental and physical weakness at the time of committing each of the instant crimes, such as stimulative disorder, etc., but in full view of all the circumstances, such as the motive and circumstance of each of the instant crimes recognized by the aforementioned evidence, the circumstance before and after the instant crimes, etc., the extent that the Defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions at the time of each of the instant crimes.