1. Upon a claim for a change in the exchange in this Court, a stock company and its double design on December 11, 2012.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Accordingly, the installation contract between the two designs and the Defendant Sungwon Construction 1) The AI real estate development contract is the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E (hereinafter “instant building”) on the double design.

(2) On February 3, 2012, a new construction contract was awarded to Defendant Sungwon Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Sungwon Construction”) and, on an individual basis, other Defendants except Defendant Sungwon Construction, the design is indicated by means of “Defendant 1” and “Defendant 2”, etc. according to the sequence in the attached list.

The contract amount was set at KRW 3,184,940,000 and the contract was concluded to subcontract the construction work of the building of this case (hereinafter “the contract of this case”).

B. Defendant 1) supply and installation 5 Plaintiff A-A-Bererer Board Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff C-C-W”) and C-W (hereinafter “C-W”) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff C-W”) 2, S-C-W Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff C-C-W”) to Plaintiff C-W Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff C-W”) 4, including Non-Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff C-W”), 5, A-Werer Board Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff C-W”) 6, and C-W (hereinafter “C-W”) 1, after the execution date of the above subcontract, re-subcontracted part of the construction work as follows.

C. On September 2012, 2012, the Plaintiffs 1Dawon, 3, 3, 3, 5, and 1, and 1, 201 were fully completed construction work under each of the above subcontract agreements, and accordingly, Defendant Sung-won’s claim for construction work.