logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.01.28 2015고단3177
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The applicant C's application for compensation shall be dismissed.

The defendant is an applicant for compensation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On October 24, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court) and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Southern Southern District Court on February 20, 2015.

[2015 Highest 3177]

1. After release, the Defendant had experienced money easily in the past due to lack of a certain occupation after release, and again, was committed in the “Ntp” (htp:/www.cafe.naver.com/joint venturerarara) on the Internet, which is one of the most valuable trading regions on the Internet.

The Defendant, around May 8, 2015, at the Defendant’s residence located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, reported the victim F’s wish to purchase the “Kameras (RX100mz)” posted on the Internet NVV, and contacted the victim with “380,000 won if deposited into the account.”

“.......”

However, even if the defendant has received the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the goods.

As above, the Defendant, as well as by deceiving the victim, received KRW 380,00 from his national bank account (G) on the same day, and received KRW 16,897,200 in total from 84 victims to the national bank, our bank, Nonghyup Bank, and corporate bank account, as shown in the attached crime list (1) from May 4, 2015 to August 24, 2015.

[2015 Highest 4196]

2. On June 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) visited the Internet NAVand the Republic of Korea, and (b) sought to purchase the 5100 Kamera posted by the Victim J; and (c) sent the goods to the victim “on the first hand if the goods are sent.”

“.......”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to sell the Kameras even if he did not receive the price of the goods because he did not have the Kameras.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and is under the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.

arrow