1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,380,00 for the Plaintiff and the following: 5% per annum from November 30, 2016 to June 26, 2019.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the FNAS car owned by E (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the G car (hereinafter “Defendant”).

On October 26, 2018, the driver of the Defendant’s vehicle driving the Defendant’s side vehicle and driving it over the central line of the road in front of the Nam-gu, Gwangju, the driver of the Defendant’s side 2:00, caused significant damage to the Plaintiff’s side by shocking the left side and the right side of the vehicle parked.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). After the instant accident, E demanded the Plaintiff to deal with the instant accident based on the special agreement for securing self-vehicle damage, and the Plaintiff towing the Plaintiff’s vehicle that cannot be operated due to the damage and stored it in the parking lot in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju (hereinafter “Maintenance Business”).

On October 28, 2016, there was a studio in the engine room inside the engine room destroyed by the Plaintiff’s vehicle on the same day at around 07:04 on the same day, and there was a studio in which the studio was moved to the flammable cable clothes, and the studio in which the studio was destroyed by a fire, and the studio in which the studio was moved to the flammable cable clothes, and the damage was inflicted on the part of the KS car and the stude car which was parked in the vicinity of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant fire.” On November 25, 2016, the Plaintiff disbursed KRW 2,755,949 as the repair cost, etc. of the said low-speed car, and KRW 7,433,448 as the repair cost, etc. of the said low-class car. On November 29, 2016, the Plaintiff paid KRW 30,080,000 as the total indemnity insurance money under the special agreement for securing self-motor vehicle damage included in the said comprehensive automobile insurance contract to E on November 29, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] The fire of this case is caused by the accident of this case where Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3 through 8, Eul evidence Nos. 2 (including the branch numbers for which the branch numbers exist), Gap evidence Nos. 2, and the purport of the whole argument of the parties.