logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원논산지원 2016.01.21 2015가단1928
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 6,595,469; (b) KRW 5,863,646; and (c) KRW 4,063,646; and (c) KRW 4,063,646, respectively, to Plaintiff A.

Reasons

Basic Facts

A. At around 13:40 on November 19, 2014, G driven H buses (hereinafter “instant buses”) and continued the front road of Jio-oba, located in I at the time of Seosan-si, Jinaba, which was located in B, with the direction of YOba-distance flood from the border of Seosan-si.

At the time of G, K was driving T 100 Oba (hereinafter “the instant Obaba”), and in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front and right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, G, while neglecting this, while proceeding to K on the left side of the Otoba of this case driven by K, G used the left part of the bus of this case on the right side of the bus of this case to use K on the floor.

As a result, at around November 28, 2014, K died from a multi-long-term vision at the Chungcheongnamnam University Hospital around 12:27.

(hereinafter “instant traffic accident”). (b)

Plaintiff

A is the spouse of the network K, and the children of plaintiffs B, C, D, E, and F are children of the network K.

C. The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has concluded a mutual aid contract for the instant bus driven by G.

[Based on the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 4-1, 2, Eul evidence 1, 2-2, Eul evidence 1, and 2, the defendant is liable for damages caused by the traffic accident of this case as the insurer of the bus of this case driven by G and the damage suffered by the deceased K and the plaintiffs pursuant to Article 10 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and Article 724 (2) of the Commercial Act.

1) According to the facts recognized as above and the purport of the evidence No. 4-1 to No. 3, the evidence No. 7, or the whole video and oral pleadings, the following circumstances can be revealed. A) The immediately preceding day of the instant traffic accident, G driving the instant bus and driving the instant bus on a two-lane road in front of the width.

arrow