logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2021.02.17 2020고단3086
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 12, 2020, the Defendant: (a) driven a sports cargo vehicle in Eco-do under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.158% from the 300-meter section from the road near B hospital where it is difficult to find out the detailed address (hereinafter referred to as the “nick-dong”) at around 02:45 on August 12, 2020 to the road in front of C apartment D, in which the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.158%.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a sports cargo vehicle even in Ecopi, in violation of the Road Traffic Act (after-accident).

On August 12, 2020, the Defendant driven a sports cargo vehicle with alcohol level of 0.158% in around 02:45, while under the influence of alcohol level, and led the two-lanes of the two-lane roads from the H hotel to C apartment zone on the side of the H hotel, where it is impossible to identify the specific address below F in leisure time.

At the time, vehicles are parked at night and at the 2,3-lanes, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to look at the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to operate the vehicle in a safe manner.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, who was parked due to negligence while neglecting this, had the part on the back of the J-5 car and K7 car owned by the victim I, was shocked with the part on the front part of the sports cargo vehicle, thereby falling off on the road. The Defendant, who followed the Defendant, was faced with the part on the front part of the passenger car owned by the victim L, which was driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant: (a) by such occupational negligence, destroyed the victims’ property to be 350,000 won of the repair cost for the said K5 and K7 vehicles ( KRW 14,094,845 for the said passenger vehicles ( KRW 8,478,710 for the said passenger vehicles of KRW 5,616,135 for the said vehicle of KRW 8,610 for the said passenger vehicles); and (b) left the scene without immediately stopping the goods of the victims to be 350,000 won; and (c) left the site without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1...

arrow