The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The Defendant found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case, even though he did not possess a large amount of stroke m or allowed E to do so by scoke m to do so at the time and place indicated in the facts charged in the instant case. The lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine, even though the Defendant did not have had a large amount of stroke m, or allowed E to do so by melting it in coffee beverages.

However, the summary of the facts charged in this case is not a person handling narcotics.

around 17:30 on October 29, 2012, the Defendant used a psychotropic drug, which was in possession of the psychotropic drug, by melting it in coffee drinks, at the Fmiwon operated by Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, and by melting it to E.

The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case on the ground that, in light of the fact that the Defendant voluntarily acknowledged that he did not know the Defendant’s personal information, and that, inasmuch as the ingredients of the stroke are detected in the stroke beverage, it appears that there was no possibility that he would have been contained in the stroke m from the date of manufacture of the stroke beverage, and that E showed a appearance different from the stroke m, it can be ruled that E was used in the stroke m, and that E could have contained stroke m ex post in the stroke beverage, and that E was found guilty of having reported the instant crime under the circumstances where it was impossible to find the Defendant guilty of having the Defendant be subject to criminal punishment by making a false report on the stroke beverage because it did not have any motive to have the Defendant be punished by stroke m in the stroke m.