1. All claims filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) are dismissed.

2. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) is against the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff).

1. Facts of premise;

A. The instant accident occurred (i.e., female Defendant and the Plaintiffs’ married G had been living together in G from November 2014 to November 1, 2014, G with economic leave was repaid on two occasions on May 12, 2015, on behalf of the Defendant’s total obligation of income contingent loans in KRW 5,437,464.

[Attachment G] around 16:40 on May 21, 2015, at the same time, the three-lanes of the three-lanes of the three-lanes around the 574 Army Academy at the Army at the Army at the Army at the Army in Seoul, Nowon-gu, Seoul, were in operation at the speed of 78km/h from the Hari-si to the Hari-si.

Article 22(1) of the former Act provides that “The instant accident” refers to “the instant accident” in which the instant two-wheeled vehicle, which was installed on the right side of the direction of the proceeding of G, was caused by G’s driver’s negligence, and G died while being treated at the hospital after the said accident.

x) Meanwhile, the Defendant suffered injuries, such as cutting the frame, cutting the right pelvis, cutting the pelvis, cutting the pelvis of the right pelvis, cutting the pelvis of the right pelvis, cutting the pelvis of the right 4 balance, cutting the pelvis of the right pelvis, cutting the pelvis of the lavis, cutting the lavis, etc. (hereinafter the “

B. (1) The Defendant, after the instant accident, stolen the amount of KRW 11,850,00,000, including a name tag, clothes, etc. from G’s residence or on several occasions from May 24, 2015, and filed a complaint with the police.

Dor police, on the ground that it is difficult to recognize a theft suspicion, was forwarded to the prosecution by the opinion that there is no suspicion of the defendant and the defendant male male and female. On October 20, 2015, the prosecutor also rendered disposition against the defendant, etc. that there is no suspicion of lack of evidence.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 6 evidence, Eul 3-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the part concerning the claim for confirmation of existence of the obligation among the principal lawsuit and the claim for counterclaim

A. According to the premise of the occurrence of liability for damages, the instant accident is attributable to.