logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.11.26 2015나20893
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The plaintiff asserted that the water supply management officer of Suwon-si Apartment Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "the apartment of this case") 101 and 402 (hereinafter "No. 402") were removed and operated within 101 and 302 (hereinafter "No. 302 of this case") occurred in the main river and the washing room from spring in 2014 to 302 of this case. The plaintiff asserted that the relation between the plaintiff and her children has disappearedd, and the family has reached the bankruptcy due to 50 won, 100 won, 200 won, 30 won, 50 won, 40 won, 50 won, 40 won, 50 won, 50 won, 80 won, 50 won, 50 won, 40 won, 50 won, 50 won, 90 won, 50 won, 80 won, 50 won, 50 won, 90 won, 80 won, 507.

B. There is no dispute between the parties to the judgment, or comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 8, the plaintiff was a lessee who had resided from December 2009 to September 29, 2014. The defendant is the owner of the above apartment building Nos. 402, the plaintiff was the owner of the above apartment building No. 402, and the artificial fishery operator who received the above evidence Nos. 302 after the plaintiff moved on September 29, 2014.

arrow