The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment of KRW 500,00,000 is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime of this case, and the crime of this case is more advantageous to the fact that the crime of this case is concurrent crimes with the crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (e.g., the crime of this case) and the latter part of Article 37

However, the fact that the defendant did not receive a letter from the victim up to the trial of the party, and did not recover from the damage, and that there were several records of punishment due to the crime of this species, etc. are disadvantageous.

In full view of such circumstances as well as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and various sentencing conditions as indicated in the instant records and pleadings, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.