logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.03.30 2017고단7857
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for eight months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants

A. The Defendants: (a) both South and North Korea; (b) Defendant A is a bad credit holder; (c) the Defendants did not have any particular property; and (d) there was no occupation or import; and (c) Defendant B did not receive money from Defendant B (name E before the opening of the name); (c) Defendant B introduced the victim as a public official in extraordinary civil service with the office of the Defendant as a public official in special service with the office of the Defendant at the H hotel located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around October 10, 2013; and (d) Defendant A introduced the victim as a public official in special service with the office of the Party B.

In today's Republic of Korea, it made a false statement that it is necessary to pay up to KRW 30 million for the proceeding cost to exercise the third period of J, and that it is necessary to lend money to him/her within one week.

However, the facts are that Defendant A was not a public official in extraordinary civil service belonging to the agency without any duty, and Defendant A was a bad credit partner, and the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to repay the borrowed money as they did not have any property or income.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim as above and acquired the check from the victim, i.e., the victim, by delivery of KRW 30 million.

B. On November 11, 2013, the Defendants issued KRW 100,000 U.S. dollars 98 to the Defendant’s false statement that “A may alter the name of financial expert to a certain bank if he/she is a financial expert,” and that “A may alter the name of financial expert to a certain bank if he/she is a financial expert.”

However, the above USD has no value as it was impossible to use it from time to time, and the Defendants are paying the above borrowed money, following the above circumstances.

arrow