A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On August 21, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car on August 22:34, 201, and proceeded along the distance of the Gyeonggi-do Culture Complex in the Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu along five-lanes from the direction of the Young-gu Office.

At night, the road is damp and the driver has a duty of care to prevent the accident by driving the road, securing the safety distance with the vehicle ahead and driving it.

Nevertheless, even though the victim E (the 46-year old) who was making a stop at the front due to negligence while neglecting this, was employed by the victim E (the 46-year old-old driver) to drive the Faler car in front of the said rocketing passenger car, and was inflicted on the victim E and his passenger G (the 47-year-old driver) for injuries, such as light salt for about two weeks in need of medical treatment, he did not comply with the request for alcohol measurement as described in paragraph (2).

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of Drinking Measures) has reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol due to the occurrence of a traffic accident that occurred while driving the said rocketing car while drinking at the above time, at the above place, and there was a reasonable ground to believe that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling and smelling on the face from the driving of the Suwonnam Police Station, and from the head of the police station affiliated with H, the Defendant was demanded from around 23:11 on the same day to comply with the drinking test by inserting the breath of a drinking measuring instrument over about 20 minutes.

Nevertheless, the defendant himself/herself is the victim of a traffic accident, who is why he/she should take a drinking test, and he/she avoided it by a method that spreads a drinking gauge in his/her hand, and did not comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The report on traffic accidents (the actual survey report);