logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.07.16 2013노2121
총포ㆍ도검ㆍ화약류등단속법위반
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., e., g., that the Defendant launched a shot gun to drive a shot gun in the process of expanding the area of livestock feed cultivation according to the direction of the Cheongyang-gun; the previous permission was included in the area where the Defendant permitted to capture harmful wild animals; the Defendant did not have any particular criminal power; and the Defendant cannot obtain permission to possess guns unless three years have passed since he was sentenced to a fine; the sentence (e.g., 500,000) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. On June 15, 2012, the Defendant obtained permission from the Chief of the Cheongyang Police Station to possess a hunting gun (RAFAE DESE, B) from the Chief of the Cheongyang Police Station; from March 8, 2013 to May 8, 2013, the Defendant obtained permission to capture harmful wild animals in the Cheongyang-gun, Cheongyang-gun, Cheongyang-gun, YUE, YUE, and on March 14, 2013; and on March 14, 2013, obtained permission to capture harmful wild animals in the Cheongyang-gun, Cheongyang-gun, Cheongyang-gun, YUE, and used a gun by launchinging the said 4 shot gun with the above hunting gun without justifiable grounds.

3. The grounds for appeal by the defendant is an unreasonable sentencing, but the appellate court may decide ex officio on the grounds that affected the judgment, even if not included in the grounds for appeal (Article 364(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act), and examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant.

A. The following facts are acknowledged according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below.

1) On June 15, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was from the head of the Cheongyang Police Station on June 15, 2012, the Defendant: (b) was a hunting gun (number B, name of a gun, DNA lux, manufacturing lael, manufacturing lux, manufacturing company Bena, and 12 (hereinafter “instant hunting gun”).

For the firearms type, the live ammunition form, the use of firearms shall be harmful water treatment, and the storage place shall be harmful water treatment.

arrow