All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the Defendant’s ground of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that all facts charged against the Defendant’s guilty portion were recognized on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the relevant legal doctrine, such as violating the logical and empirical rules and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the fabrication and uttering of

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of appeal by the prosecutor in light of the records, the lower court is justifiable to reverse the first instance judgment convicting the Defendant of larceny among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning and to have rendered a not guilty verdict. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience and the free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.