logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.07.24 2014고정659
건축법위반
Text

Defendant

A A Fines 3,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 5,000,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 3,000,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the representative director of (ju) H, who is the actual operator of (ju) Gcondo, who is the contractor of the new construction of the G Condo (hereinafter referred to as the “instant Condo”); Defendant C is the supervisor of the new construction of the instant Condo; Defendant A is the supervisor of the new construction of the instant Condo; Defendant A is the public official of Grade VII with the approval and permission of the J-Gun Office and its affiliated public official (local facility assistant).

Although the Defendants need to submit a supervision report prepared by the construction supervisor to obtain approval for use of the instant containers, the former architect K did not prepare and deliver a supervision report on the grounds of unpaid design and supervision service costs, etc., and the Defendants were willing to prepare a false supervision report as if Defendant C had performed supervision from July 2010, even though there was no fact that Defendant C had performed construction supervision, and to conduct the procedure of approval for use based on it.

Accordingly, around August 3, 2012, Defendant B requested Defendant C to prepare a false report on supervision as above and to the effect that Defendant B and Defendant C apply for approval of use of the aforementioned contents. Defendant C prepared a false report on supervision as above, and submitted it to the approval and permission authority of the J-Gun Office on February 5, 201, the interim supervision report on January 27, 201, and the completion report on supervision as of August 28, 2012.

As a result, Defendants conspired to prepare and submit an interim supervision report or completion supervision report in a false manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The interrogation protocol of Defendants B, C, and A prepared by the prosecution;

1. An interrogation protocol of defendants A, L, and M by prosecution;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each intermediate report on supervision and report on the completion of supervision;

1. Article 110 of the Building Act as well as Article 110 of the same Act for the purpose of criminal facts;

arrow