logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.06.09 2016고단1532
국민체육진흥법위반(도박개장등)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person who is not an entrusted business entity or a national sports promotion corporation of the Seoul Olympic Games or a person who is not an entrusted business entity shall not provide property or property benefits to persons who win the results of sports promotion by issuing sports promotion votes or similar things.

Nevertheless, the Defendants offered offices in Vietnam with the G operating “D” (the website address, such as E and F, is periodically changed), which is an Internet illegal gambling site, and the G selected employees in Korea and then released the proceeds of the site by inviting an employee to be sent to Vietnam office or by recruiting an gambling passbook to be deposited in the gambling site. The Defendants, while managing the gambling site, intended to share the roles of the sports registration (e.g., entering the sports event on the website), the sports closing (e.g., entering the results of the sports event), the shock and exchange (e., calculating the total betting and the dividends after the games), and the role of managing the employees by taking overall charge of the Vietnam office.

The Defendants conspired with G and H, etc. as above, from June 8, 2015 to February 22, 2016, Defendant A and B opened a “D” site at each of the offices located in the residents of Vietnam from November 13, 2015 to January 17, 2016, and received from members the money for gambling from the said site to the bank account, such as a new bank account in the name of Switzerland P, and received the money for betting, and made its members receive the money for betting, and paid dividends in accordance with the actual distribution rate by setting the betting rate in cases where the betting results are valuable.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with G and H to commit any act similar to the issuance of sports promotion voting rights, and at the same time set up a space for gambling on the Internet for the purpose of profit-making.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ 1.

arrow