logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.25 2016나2019884
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the written judgment of the court of first instance, except for the defendant's grounds for appeal as set forth in the following two. Thus, the court's explanation concerning this case is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Judgment on the defendant's grounds for appeal

A. The defendant asserts that the defendant's negligence in relation to the tort of this case is 30-50% and the defendant's responsibility should be limited, since the defendant argued that the victim's negligence in relation to the tort of this case is 30-50%, and the defendant's liability should be limited, since the victim's tort of this case was committed contingently, discovered abnormal signs of the victim, reported 119 and carried out cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

B. According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1 through 9 and the arguments, it is difficult to conclude that the Defendant committed the instant tort by contingency while drinking alcohol, reported to the Defendant 119, and that there was a conclusive intent to murder. Also, the instant tort is a female under 53 years of age, with an extended 152 cm, body size of 43 km, and body size of 53 km. The Defendant used the victim’s face and body size as drinking and part of body body body body body body 1 to 10 g, and 1 to 4 g, and 1 to 9 g, to 1 to 7 g, to 1 to 9 g, to 1 to 9 g, to 1 to 20 g, to 1 to 1 to 9 g, to 2 to 1 to 2 to 1 to 2 to 4 to 2 to 1 to 2 to 1 to 2 to 2 to 3 to 3 to 3 to 33 to 3 to 3 to 4 to 1 to 1 to 2 to 2 to 2 to 2 to 3 to 2 to 2 to 2 to 2 to 3 to 2 to 3

arrow