[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a director of B in-house corporation operating Internet web House E, and Defendant B is a corporation with the purpose of software development and supply business.

1. Defendant A E E E Edi “the person in whose name the victim used” was exposed to the E site on July 2, 2015 at around 11:32, 2015 to the victim’s blicker’s clicking “motion picture in which the victim’s clicker’s clicker’s copyright is held” was opened, and the number of subscribers using the name clicker’s clicker’s clicking from July 2, 2015 to July 16, 2015, the damaged party, as described in the list of crimes in the attached Form, provided the victim’s 196 video products whose copyright is held, as a business, so that many unspecified subscribers can receive a reproduction and transmission of the video products from the victim’s office from October 15, 2014 to the victim’s online work. The Defendant provided the victim’s online work with his/her knowledge of the fact.

2. The Defendant Company B was a corporation established for the purpose of software development and supply business, and the Defendant, the representative of the Defendant, committed a violation as referred to in the foregoing paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect against a public prosecutor and the defendant A in the preparation of the police;

1. Details of damage, a certified copy of a corporate registry, the cases of requests for technical measures against each particular online service provider, etc., E Infringement materials [the Defendants and the defense counsel fulfilled all the possible technical measures against infringement, so the Defendants and the defense counsel has not been relieved of, or had no intention to, their liability pursuant to Article 102(1) or 102(2) of the Copyright Act.

The argument is asserted.

However, in full view of the following facts and circumstances admitted by the above evidence, the following facts and circumstances are examined.