logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.18 2015고단1285
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 29, 2014, around 21:50 on April 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) waited for the Victim E (Inn, 44 years old); (b) followed the victim entering the entrance; and (c) threatened the victim with assault and death on the victim’s head on the ground that the victim does not move to the entrance; and (d) led the victim to the G unmanned telecom located in the Chungcheongnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F on April 30, 2014.

In addition, the Defendant saw the victim into the above G unmanned telecom 216 room in front of the victim, walking the victim at 10 times with the hand floor, forced the victim who was faced with the victim's assault with the victim's assault, and led the victim who was faced with the victim's assault with the victim's entrance, and "the year, day, day, day, and day. Although judging women in the inside, there is no person who does not fit the mind, I do not want to spher." The Defendant saw the victim's head head in front of the victim, forced the victim to leave the victim's seat, and even after leaving the victim's seat with the victim's coercion, it was well aware of the victim's conspiracy with the victim.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim such as 14-day snow, snow, surrounding snow, and other sacrific damage.

2. Violence;

A. On March 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 01:00 on March 29, 2014, 2014, (b) reported the victim who was waiting for the victim to return home in front of Daejeon Pungdong D, 210 dong 10 dong 103, and (c) assaulted the victim, who was able to live together with others; and (d) led the victim, who was able to do so.

B. On April 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 15:57, on April 15, 2014, the Defendant: (b) committed assault against the victim on the ground that the victim did not take the Defendant’s demand while she was satisfying around the Daejeon Pung-gu Seo-gu Madro 2, 56 Mesatisfa, and talked with the victim on the ground that the victim did not take part in the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. The facts of the defendant's legal statement (as to the facts of No. 2 at the time of market) and the facts of No. 1 of the defendant's partial statement;

arrow