logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.11.29 2018가단136645
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) from May 21, 2018 to Plaintiff A, KRW 4,857,142, respectively, and each of them.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. E (FF students; hereinafter “the deceased”) hospitalized in G convalescent hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) on April 19, 2017, which was accompanied by chronic kidney diseases (five (five) and terminal kidney diseases), 2-type cronology diseases, cerebral typhism, chronic chrochissis, and other island network, and received blood marology and rehabilitation treatment at the Defendant hospital from that time.

B. On May 15, 2018, at the Defendant hospital’s rehabilitation treatment room on May 16:31, 2018, the Deceased received physical treatment from the water treatmentr H on the left and left bridge, etc., and then, the Deceased faced the left shoulder on the floor by facing the left-hand shoulder at the rehabilitation treatment room between the water treatmentr and the shift of the water treatmentr.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital reported to the doctor 16:32 on the same day, and the physician of the Defendant Hospital took an X-ray photograph on the same day to verify the condition of the deceased after having provided first aid.

C. On the 16th day of the same month, the Deceased was diagnosed at the left upper end of the 16th day of the same month by wearing a sabridge, and was transferred to the J Hospital emergency room by showing unstable symptoms and heat symptoms on the 18th day of the same month, and died on the 14:51 day of the same month in which the above hospital was receiving treatment.

The plaintiff's death diagnosis is written in the form of blood transfusion due to the second death, the second death, the second death, and the cause of the second death.

E. The plaintiff A’s spouse, the plaintiff B, and C are the deceased’s children.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-6, Gap evidence No. 7-21, and 42

2. 원고의 청구원인 주장 망인은 뇌경색으로 왼쪽 팔, 다리의 마비와 혈액투석을 위한 삽관술로 인해 스스로 거동할 수 없어 낙상 고위험환자였으므로, 피고 병원 의료진은 재활치료실 내의 침대, 인식밴드에 낙상고위험 팻말을 부착하고, 낙상예방을 위한 안전장치를 설치하며,...

arrow