beta
Text
1. The defendant shall make 1. each of the real estate listed in attached Forms 1 through 4 and 5 to 10 to the plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff acquired the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 3 before the defendant and the defendant's re-inheritors. around 1994, the plaintiff married to the defendant in around 1996 and held a title trust with the defendant for the purpose of preserving property. The plaintiff purchased the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 5 and 10 million won and completed the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the defendant in accordance with the title trust agreement with the defendant while purchasing the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 5 through 10, and purchased the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 4 on April 10, 2008 and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the defendant by purchasing the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 5 and No. 10,000 from 200 to 209.
Then, the defendant asserts that the above contract for title trust was terminated by the delivery of a duplicate of the complaint in this case, and that the defendant is obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on each of the real estate listed in attached Forms 1 through 4 and 5 to 10 shares among the real estate listed in attached Forms 1 through 5 (10) (hereinafter "land in this case").
As to this, the defendant asserts that no title trust contract has been entered into between the plaintiff and that all of the land in this case was purchased with the defendant's funds.
B. The judgment of one side of the married couple is presumed to be the special property of the nominal owner of the property acquired in his sole name during the marriage, and there was cooperation between one side of the married couple in acquiring the property.
Although the presumption is not reversed solely on the fact that there was an objection or a mutual aid, if the other party proves that he actually acquired the price of the property concerned, the presumption shall be reversed, and the other party who bears the price shall be the actual owner of the property and shall be the person under the name of the convenience.