The judgment below

Of the above, the part concerning Defendant A shall be reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Defendant

A.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not only adopt the injury diagnosis and treatment confirmation without validity as evidence of conviction, but also did not adopt as evidence the statement of H’s witness and the result of CCTV verification, each of the important evidence of the lower court.

As such, the court below found the defendants guilty of the facts charged in this case by violating the rules of evidence, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding the facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

Even if the Defendants’ acts of this case constitute self-defense, they do not constitute a crime.

2. Determination:

A. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, and in particular CCTV images, the following facts are acknowledged.

① E (which is white stamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s, and the Defendant A (the tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s tamper’s ther with the Defendant A.

(12:29) The Ba Ma was sealed by Defendant A’s chest on his chest, and the F was removed from them by removing him (the lave, laved, laved, laved, laved with White laveds at the color laves).

(12:35) Defendant A and E followed a dispute with F, etc., but it is not clear whether Defendant A was engaged in fathere, etc. (12:43 to 12:46) or fathere, etc.

(12:50 to 13:25). (2) Defendant A was wraped with F, which was fighting.