Text
All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. misunderstanding of facts 1) The Defendant (the defrauded’s fraud with respect to the same life insurance company) did not have acquired money by deceiving the victim company with the intent to commit the crime of defraudation as stated in the judgment below. 2) According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor (the accused’s fraud with respect to E), according to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor (the accused’s fraud with respect to E), the Defendant may fully recognize the
B. 1) The sentence of the lower court on the grounds that the Defendant’s sentence is too unreasonable is unreasonable. 2) The lower court’s sentence is too uneasible and unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. The lower court rejected the Defendant’s assertion on the same argument as the grounds for appeal by the Defendant. In light of the circumstances set forth in its reasoning, the lower court rejected the Defendant’s assertion by specifically explaining the grounds for appeal under the title “the judgment on the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion (2013da2052 related to the judgment on the assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel).” Examining the record comparison with the evidence legitimately adopted and examined, the lower court’s judgment is justifiable, and it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant, as stated in its reasoning, by deceiving the victim company with the intent to commit fraud, and by deceiving the Defendant. Furthermore, the Defendant’s statement by the witness H or the evidence presented by his defense counsel, does not interfere with the acknowledgement of the fact of crime, and there is no evidence to reverse it. Accordingly, the lower court acquitted the Defendant on this part of the facts charged on the ground that it is difficult to recognize the credibility of the testimony by E and R, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone alone, by deceiving the Defendant, a criminal defendant.
A thorough examination of the evidence of this case in light of the records, the court below's determination of not guilty of this part of the facts charged is just.