The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. From September 2, 2018, the Defendant was in dispute with the victim B and C Game Account with the authority to use the said Account and obstructed the victim’s access to the game.

9. 10.까지 서울시 강동구 D아파트 E호 피고인의 주거지에서 피고인의 휴대전화(F)를 이용하여 피해자의 휴대전화(G)로, ‘부모님한테 전화한통넣어드릴까 ’, ‘부모님폰번호불러줘봐 내가잘말씀드려볼게 ㅋㅋㅋ’, ‘해킹범 B아 남에케릭으로장난치다가 막히니까부들부들이냐 ’, ‘다른폰으로전화해줄까 폰많은데’, ‘전화는 계속할거야, 형 참고로휴대폰장사도한다 폰많다’, ‘전화걸고번호바꿔서다시걸고ㅋ 동생들시켜서전화나하라고하은대고’, ‘너내얼굴보면 아무말못할걸 기대해라 집에 들어갈때 검정색밴츠s클래스H있나잘봐 그게나야’, ‘벤츠s클래스검정색 니네집앞에서있으면난줄안어 니얼군아니까 내가먼저하는척해줄게’, ‘연락은안하는데 조만간보자 기대해 너도시달려봐야지 얼마나짜증낫는데 ’ 등 범죄일람표와 같이 59회에 걸쳐 휴대전화 문자메시지를 보냄으로써, 정보통신망을 통하여 공포심이나 불안감을 유발하는 글을 반복적으로 피해자에게 도달하게 하였다.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Articles 74 (1) 3 and 44-7 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.;

(b) A crime of non-compliance with an intention: Article 74 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.

C. A non-prosecution of punishment: on March 20, 2020, after the prosecution of this case, the victim expressed his intention not to want the punishment against the defendant. D.

Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act