The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (4 million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the fact that the Defendant was in favor of the Defendant, the fact that the Defendant was punished for driving alcohol, and that the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration was not low, etc., and other sentencing conditions indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive for committing the crime, etc., it is difficult to deem the lower court’s punishment to be unfair because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, which reads “Article 148-2(2)3 of the Road Traffic Act” as “Article 148-2(2)2 of the Road Traffic Act” as “Article 148-2(2)2 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, ex officio pursuant to Article 25(1) of the same Act.”